Bell Custom Writing - Sample Research Papers

Home | Custom Writing | Writing Tips | Support

Justice And Economic Distribution

Customer Description:

Address the issue of justice and economic distribution. Begin by presenting an overview of the issue (i.e., briefly state what is at stake in the issue and describe the main positions involved). Attempt to resolve the issue by defending one of the theories of distributive justice discussed in class. A successful defense must (1) provide a moral justification for the position defended and (2) reply to objections to the theory raised in class and in the text. You have the option of supporting your position by canvassing objections to the competing theories (however, this does not constitute a moral justification).

Paper Body:

Some users enjoy better access to the common property resource because they possess a relatively large amount of the production factors required to exploit it (capital equipment, control over labor power, better skills and knowledge, etc.). This advantage may originate in past accumulation of wealth, greater network of social relations, better education, or in a privileged access to markets where critical inputs such as credit and manpower can be obtained. In reality, many of these factors are narrowly interlocked.

To take the example of credit, influential individuals are often found to gain a disproportionate share of the funds available because they have better collaterals to offer, greater trustworthiness, stronger connections with leading persons in credit-giving agencies or better information about available credit opportunities. Regarding labor, their enviable position may result from the fact that they have sufficient cash to pay advance money or give consumption credit to hired workers, that they have many social relations or large families to relay on, etc.

Economic distribution gives incomes according potency of assets to owners of factors of production such as labor, capital as well as farmland and that is socially righteous. But this is only one look at justice: incomes are formed according to the main economic laws - the law of demand and the law of offering and of the maximum productivity of factors. From this point the low income of unskilled workers the demand on which is insignificant will be completely fair. And also the high income of the broker managed to foresee dynamics of the prices will be fair.

However in any society there are people, which for the first have no the factors of manufacture - they are invalid (children, people of advanced age, invalids) and deprived; (unemployed) ; secondly those whose can not apply the work, i.e. noncompetitive in the market of work; thirdly which do not wish to work by virtue of the belief. The persons engaged in public sector do not participate in a competition in the labor-market.

Nevertheless in 20th century the concepts and doctrines assigning on the state a task of maintenance of such rights of the man, as the right to the certain standard of well-being are more and more distributed. And the distribution of the incomes in market economy does not guarantee to each man an acceptable level of the income irrespective of presence of the factor of manufacture and results of economic activity. That provides certain social injustice of the market economics.

Therefore in real life distribution of the incomes in the countries with market economy is carried out not only as a result of free game of market forces, but also on the basis of state regulation of various flows of the incomes by their redistribution. This phenomenon makes social politics of the state.

The money incomes of the population are formed of different sources, basic of which are next ones: the factorial incomes (wages) and money receipts on a line of the state programs. The transfer payments have essential influence on formation of the incomes of the population, they manage by the pension maintenance, the alimony of invalid citizens is carried out, they are paid for various kinds of the grant. The shares of transfer payments and wages in the parity in the incomes of the population plays the important role in formation of economic behavior of an individual, his labor motivation. The dominant role of wages develops such qualities, as enterprise, initiative. In case of increase of a role of transfer payments quite often there is a formation of the passive relation to industrial activity and psychology of depending upon society.

The distribution of means on a line of the programs of the help is carried out on three directions.

1. The part of receipts received by the population is depending on work, but thus the sizes of the satisfied needs are considered also.

2. The payments have no connection with the job of worker, but the sizes of needs to satisfy payments are directed have taken into account . These are: manual for the workers have had many children, for lonely mothers, for the specialized treatment, grant of the state for the keeping of children in children's establishments, in schools or boarding schools. The size of such grant depends on number of children and the level of the incomes of the parents.

3. The basic part in the form of privileges and services taken by the population directly in the natural form through the appropriate establishments of non-productive branch. This part of distributed means forms some kind of the "additional" incomes: they do not pass through the budget of family and it is impossible to dispose of them on its discretion. Such incomes are distributed without the measure of individual work and are defined wholly by interests and opportunities of a society for the concrete historical time.

The consumers of a part of the state help are not all workers in common, but only those from them whose need that and only in a measure of that needs. For example for free-of-charge medical aid those people address who is more often and more severe sick and can not pay medical services, as well as person having many teenage children use the services of school establishments. In other words, the payments on a line of the programs of the help are called to soften distinctions in a level of the incomes called not by distinctions in work, and reasons outside of the process of work, and also to promote satisfaction of a number of needs most important for tasks of formation of abilities to work, for development of the person, achievement of higher general educational and cultural levels accessible public health services and pension maintenance. But as this form of distribution mentions interests of a society as a whole and each member closely, the state politics in this area should be especially active.

As to levels of differentiation of the incomes of the population, they are formed under the influence of not only economic, but also political, social, historical, national, ethical and other norms of life of a society. Therefore that is acceptable enough for the point of view of the economic theory, that is not always corresponds to ethical norms of the given society and on the contrary... It testifies about also that the absence of same look at among the economists and scientific of other branches on definition of concept of social validity and principles of its realization have been marking till now. There are four basic opinions there:

1. Egalitar - all members of a society receive the equal boons. There is no inequality in distribution of the incomes in a society.

2. Rawlsianian - utility of the least supplied persons dominates.
It is connected to a name of John Rawls, an American philosopher. Such differentiation of the incomes is considered as fair, when the relative economic inequality is admitted only then, if it promotes achievement of higher absolute standard of living by the poor members of a society (Chyek F. Pernicious self-confidence p. 131)...