![]() ![]()
| |||||
|
|
|||||
|
Logic: Generalizations Vague generalizations give comfort to the non-thinker, or to the thinker who feels fatigued, bored, or indecisive. Misuse of evidence sometimes helps generalizations do their work of oversimplifying. Good writers recognize that they will sometimes, because they are human, feel tired and lazy. They take breaks in order to gain new perspective on their words, seeking out the most persuasive aspects of arguments. Thinking of writing as persuasion helps a writer test for generalizations, prejudice, and empty rhetoric. A. Either/Or Either/or is the most common generalization, our heritage, in part, from elections where Candidate X and Candidate Y blitz each other into false extremes ("Either you vote for me or the entire country will go to hell in a handbasket"). In inaccurate either/or thinking, a specific first statement is attached to a huge and unwieldy second statement:
B. Prejudice Prejudice makes unfair generalizations about other people, prejudging their worth on the basis of false or irrational evidence. Prejudice refuses to recognize complexity and diversity. A common sign of prejudiced thinking is the argument ad hominem (at the man). This argument can support or undermine an issue by misusing the personality behind it:
"Get rid of prejudice" is not as useful a directive as "find out why you think this way." Prejudice is a sign of misused emotion in writing, but that doesn't mean all strong feeling is bad. A quote from Black Elk, an Oglala Sioux Indian who witnessed the wars for the Black Hills, illustrates how strong feeling, even so-called "partisan" feeling, can make writing beautiful and moving:
C. Gas-bag Words Certain words or phrases sometimes encourage you to oversimplify. They are signs of impatience, making you see the world in extremes, giving you false and facile choices, selling you a half-truth disguised as a fact:
...And "advertising copy" words which emphasize power, strength, freedom, totality, perfection, or exclusiveness:
D. Useful Questions 1. Test your ideas with relative words. A book, a trunk, or a door is either open or shut, but a criminal case, an election, or a mind is often a bit of both. English has lots of relative words which can make an absolute statement more accurate: sometimes, some, few, most, occasionally, often, seldom help show that the relationships you discuss in writing have complex histories or multiple meanings. Try inserting these words in your most general statements, when appropriate, to argue more accurately. The statements which result might encourage you to think more deeply. 2. Find out what your thesis is and ask if you really believe it. When writers turn out papers quickly, working either to please an outside authority or simply to get the assignment done, they often say what they don't mean. From forced sincerity or artificial arguing flow the illogical examples illustrated above. Merely correcting a random sentence by making its absolute claims sound relative is not enough. A good writer asks, sometimes uncomfortably, what she believes and why. Asking that question may make writing a paper more work, but it will lead to clearer thinking and stronger writing. 3. Deliberately draft a bad argument. Sometimes writers work better when they deliberately take time to exorcise the demons of false reasoning before writing a serious and convincing argument. Writing a parody of your own best argument can show you what won't support it: slippery statistics, hasty inferences, puffy quotes from big shots, mad leapies, innuendoes and outright lies. Having "argued" that Edgar A. Guest is a better poet than Shakespeare, that Emily Dickinson was the illegitimate son of Charles Dickens; having "demonstrated" that the world began on October 31, 1144 B.C. at 4:30 p.m., or that all Siberian violinists are schizophrenics, you now have a standard of comparison. Nonsense can lead to good sense. Misuse
of Evidence
|
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
Bell Writing Inc. Copyright 1997 - 2001 |
|||||